User:Bambiprime: Difference between revisions
Bambiprime (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bambiprime (talk | contribs) |
||
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== About == | == About == | ||
Here | Here are some bullet points that cover my general ethos and things my sessions and tracks emphasize. | ||
==== Real brainwashing. ==== | |||
Though not aggressive and generally with a positive, encouraging vibe, my work is ''forceful'' and makes use of every trick I know, to the best of my ability, to ensure deep hypnosis and compliance, embed post-hypnotic triggers to the point of irresistibility and effect real change. | |||
==== No time-wasting. ==== | |||
I eschew anything that doesn't contribute to the conditioning and try to make sure inductions and deepeners are no less thematic or erotic than main programming sections. | |||
In particular, I assume listeners have [[Submitting For Bambis|sufficient hypnotic experience, subject agency and/or safety measures]] — whether naturally, through practice or separate training — to achieve the results they desire and interpret the conditioning accordingly, and don't make them sit through tedious warnings or safety assurances in every session. | |||
==== Gender-neutrality. ==== | |||
While my tracks exclusive refer to the listener in the feminine, and mention specific body parts (breasts, clit, etc), no ''original'' gender — different or not — or transformation thereof is assumed, and body parts are not explicitly specified to be real, imaginary, or something else. | |||
Most tracks ''are'' designed to encourage more (stereotypically) feminine thoughts and behaviours, but the intent is that this should apply just as well to anyone who desires that. | |||
==== Orientation-neutrality. ==== | |||
Similarly, while my tracks tend to encourage desire for and submission to cock, use oral penetration as a conditioning tool, and so on, no explicit reference is made to any particular owner, form or gender of said cock(s). | |||
The intent is that the listener is free to imagine partners of any gender, abstract genderless cocks, dildos, or whatever else as they please. | |||
==== Immersive production. ==== | |||
When I first started, you'd often hear it repeated in the community that "hypnosis recordings can never be as effective as a ''real'' [live] session". It has generally been a goal of mine to show that this is nonsense, and they're simply different mediums with different strengths and weaknesses. | |||
Yes, live hypnosis can be interactive and adapted to fit the subject in ways recordings cannot. But well-produced recordings can offer a level of immersive experience a live session cannot hope to replicate, and this is more than merely bells and whistles. My production style involves extensive use of synchronized soundscapes and sound effects, multiple vocal tracks with different purposes, and so on. | |||
== About newer content == | |||
Additionally, here are some more bullet points about things I've decided more recently, which were not always adhered to by older material, but should be from the [[Session_index#Reboot_sessions|reboot sessions]] and onwards: | |||
==== Positive reinforcement. ==== | |||
One or two older tracks used negative reinforcement, training anxiety responses and the like. Newer sessions will use positive reinforcement only, since it has less potential for harmful reactions, is more fun and works better anyway. | |||
Additionally, the tone should be lighter and perhaps more playful overall, without sacrificing effectiveness. | |||
==== Mutual symbiosis. ==== | |||
Various older tracks encouraged a relationship between Bambi and the "old self" that was in some sense combatative and/or hostile. Newer material will approach this in a more positive way. Note that this is a difference in tone, not content: there will still be addiction and "takeover" elements, just framed in such a way as to imply mutual benefit for both parties. | |||
==== (More) inclusiveness. ==== | |||
Though unintentional, some listeners occasionally took wording in older content to specifically imply MTF elements, or that the listener is "really" male. Newer sessions will be more careful, e.g. by encouraging "bimbo" or "ultra-feminine" thought patterns and behaviour rather than merely "girly". | |||
== Q&A == | == Q&A == | ||
Line 19: | Line 53: | ||
; Why do you provide your work for free?: I'm a sub. Releasing my work is an act of service which I do in the hopes that it will bring others similar pleasure and enjoyment as it does me. Hearing positive feedback or fun/hot experiences other listeners have had means more to me than monetary compensation. | ; Why do you provide your work for free?: I'm a sub. Releasing my work is an act of service which I do in the hopes that it will bring others similar pleasure and enjoyment as it does me. Hearing positive feedback or fun/hot experiences other listeners have had means more to me than monetary compensation. | ||
; Does it feel weird that you started something that got so big?: Yes. It's also kind of neat.<br><br>I had a feeling I was doing something at least a bit unique, and a vague hope it might act as a template of sorts, but I didn't at all expect the level of uptake and community involvement it has had, to the point of becoming a de-facto subculture/subkink of its own. It's nice to see it has resonated with so many people. | |||
; How do you create such (insert adjective here) files?: There isn't really any secret trick. It's a combination of many years' experience in both audio production and scriptwriting; a bit of natural talent; a ton of practice, iteration, and self-experimentation (said self being an unusually difficult hypnotic subject); and a level of perfectionism which compels me to sink a frankly absurd amount of time and effort into every aspect of a track. | ; How do you create such (insert adjective here) files?: There isn't really any secret trick. It's a combination of many years' experience in both audio production and scriptwriting; a bit of natural talent; a ton of practice, iteration, and self-experimentation (said self being an unusually difficult hypnotic subject); and a level of perfectionism which compels me to sink a frankly absurd amount of time and effort into every aspect of a track. | ||
; I heard Bambi Sleep is so powerful it must be a CIA-backed mind control experiment. Is this true?: Yes, absolutely. | ; I heard Bambi Sleep is so powerful it must be a CIA-backed mind control experiment. Is this true?: Yes, absolutely. |
Latest revision as of 09:13, 9 June 2025
I am the original creator of Bambi Sleep and author of the mainline sessions.
The Bambi Prime name was invented by the community, since I didn't originally have the the presence of mind to pick a particularly distinguishing name, and sort of stuck. It is a reference to Optimus Prime.
About
Here are some bullet points that cover my general ethos and things my sessions and tracks emphasize.
Real brainwashing.
Though not aggressive and generally with a positive, encouraging vibe, my work is forceful and makes use of every trick I know, to the best of my ability, to ensure deep hypnosis and compliance, embed post-hypnotic triggers to the point of irresistibility and effect real change.
No time-wasting.
I eschew anything that doesn't contribute to the conditioning and try to make sure inductions and deepeners are no less thematic or erotic than main programming sections.
In particular, I assume listeners have sufficient hypnotic experience, subject agency and/or safety measures — whether naturally, through practice or separate training — to achieve the results they desire and interpret the conditioning accordingly, and don't make them sit through tedious warnings or safety assurances in every session.
Gender-neutrality.
While my tracks exclusive refer to the listener in the feminine, and mention specific body parts (breasts, clit, etc), no original gender — different or not — or transformation thereof is assumed, and body parts are not explicitly specified to be real, imaginary, or something else.
Most tracks are designed to encourage more (stereotypically) feminine thoughts and behaviours, but the intent is that this should apply just as well to anyone who desires that.
Orientation-neutrality.
Similarly, while my tracks tend to encourage desire for and submission to cock, use oral penetration as a conditioning tool, and so on, no explicit reference is made to any particular owner, form or gender of said cock(s).
The intent is that the listener is free to imagine partners of any gender, abstract genderless cocks, dildos, or whatever else as they please.
Immersive production.
When I first started, you'd often hear it repeated in the community that "hypnosis recordings can never be as effective as a real [live] session". It has generally been a goal of mine to show that this is nonsense, and they're simply different mediums with different strengths and weaknesses.
Yes, live hypnosis can be interactive and adapted to fit the subject in ways recordings cannot. But well-produced recordings can offer a level of immersive experience a live session cannot hope to replicate, and this is more than merely bells and whistles. My production style involves extensive use of synchronized soundscapes and sound effects, multiple vocal tracks with different purposes, and so on.
About newer content
Additionally, here are some more bullet points about things I've decided more recently, which were not always adhered to by older material, but should be from the reboot sessions and onwards:
Positive reinforcement.
One or two older tracks used negative reinforcement, training anxiety responses and the like. Newer sessions will use positive reinforcement only, since it has less potential for harmful reactions, is more fun and works better anyway.
Additionally, the tone should be lighter and perhaps more playful overall, without sacrificing effectiveness.
Mutual symbiosis.
Various older tracks encouraged a relationship between Bambi and the "old self" that was in some sense combatative and/or hostile. Newer material will approach this in a more positive way. Note that this is a difference in tone, not content: there will still be addiction and "takeover" elements, just framed in such a way as to imply mutual benefit for both parties.
(More) inclusiveness.
Though unintentional, some listeners occasionally took wording in older content to specifically imply MTF elements, or that the listener is "really" male. Newer sessions will be more careful, e.g. by encouraging "bimbo" or "ultra-feminine" thought patterns and behaviour rather than merely "girly".
Q&A
- Why did you create Bambi Sleep?
- It was initially and has always been primarily to listen to myself. I wanted serious, intense, high-quality brainwashing content, with a focus on particular kinks, that actually worked (on me), and generally found everything else available lacking in one or (usually) more of these areas.
- Why do you provide your work for free?
- I'm a sub. Releasing my work is an act of service which I do in the hopes that it will bring others similar pleasure and enjoyment as it does me. Hearing positive feedback or fun/hot experiences other listeners have had means more to me than monetary compensation.
- Does it feel weird that you started something that got so big?
- Yes. It's also kind of neat.
I had a feeling I was doing something at least a bit unique, and a vague hope it might act as a template of sorts, but I didn't at all expect the level of uptake and community involvement it has had, to the point of becoming a de-facto subculture/subkink of its own. It's nice to see it has resonated with so many people.
- How do you create such (insert adjective here) files?
- There isn't really any secret trick. It's a combination of many years' experience in both audio production and scriptwriting; a bit of natural talent; a ton of practice, iteration, and self-experimentation (said self being an unusually difficult hypnotic subject); and a level of perfectionism which compels me to sink a frankly absurd amount of time and effort into every aspect of a track.
- I heard Bambi Sleep is so powerful it must be a CIA-backed mind control experiment. Is this true?
- Yes, absolutely.